
Edit: Read more of his genius HERE.

“From: Richard Kromka
To: Francois Rodrigue:
Sent: Friday, September 18th 2009. 4:42 am
I think the hornets nest has gotten too messy. I think Rick is dangerously out of control and could open up the company and the board to obscene liability – if he hasn't already. As for Treco – I feel the same way although our attendant risk there is not so much explicit as profound distrust. I'm literally loosing sleep about having to deal with either one of them or alternatively having to go forward in good faith and represent them to a third party......
I can't stand thinking, plotting or frankly worrying about how we are about to get hurt (or not paid) any longer....I don't want any more of the same shit – always worrying that we are going to be sued by either one or both of the crazy people (Treco and xG).”
“xG and Treco were soon facing cash shortages and urgently needed further infusions of outside capital. Despite his earlier insistence that he would not have to raise capital and the assurances from Lloyd and Bohman that Treco would assure xG’s liquidity, Kromka was suddenly drafted for the task of seeking outside investors for xG and Treco. He, along with co-defendant, Francois Rodrigue, then set about trying to generate interest from venture capital firms and other respected funding sources.
“two main difficulties in utilizing venture capital firms and other funding sources were Treco’s and xG’s reputations (as well as the reputations of their owners), and uncertainty that Treco would make the necessary payments pursuant to the Infrastructure Agreement on time, or indeed at all. Furthermore, xG’s product roll-out was constantly being postponed and the word in that sector of the business world was that xG had nothing to offer.”Obviously Beechtree would want conformation that everything was Kosher with regards to the technology, but the Due Dilligence they planned was the last straw for Rick – the reason? They'd find out the tech was nothing special.......
“Dealing with Treco’s and xG’s management presented an even more challenging scenario. Neither would communicate with the other, so Kromka many times had to serve as the go-between, which placed him in untenable situations.... Bohman and Lloyd avoided speaking directly to Mooers and told Kromka that the reason for this was to increase Mooers’ “insecurity” in their relationship and that they will only talk to Mooers when 'he ran out of cash' and they constantly discussed with Kromka the idea of suing Mooers and taking over xG”. Then when critical descisions had to be made they would “be out of communication with Kromka” entirely, leaving him hanging.
“Mooers did not communicate with Lloyd and Bohman because, among other things, xG continually underperformed” and even though more and more “desperate to obtain financing for xG” would not follow any advice Kromka and others gave him. “In addition to all of these distractions and irrational behavior, xG was nowhere closer to producing a market-ready product, which made raising capital even more difficult.” xG were “inable to put together a coherent plan to monetize the xMax system.”
from John Prescott
to palmi@psr.is
cc info@wennbergindustries.se
date Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM
subject Sales of restricted xG Shares.
mailed-by googlemail.com
hide details 11:20 AM (0 minutes ago)
Dear Mr Sigmarsson,
I write a blog about xG Technology. My last post was about you selling xG Technology shares whilst they were under restriction, via an unregulated stock dealer, and at around half the then market price. I thought it only fair to give you the chance to reply, and would welcome your input into the discussion. I promise to post your reply without editing on the blog.
You will find the post here: http://xgtechnologyscam.blogspot.com/2009/09/mats-spanks-palmi.html
Yours Sincerely,
John Prescott.
Lock-up Agreement relating to shares in which Director is interested
xG Technology, Inc. (LSE-AIM: XGT, "xG" or the "Company"), which has developed an innovative, low-cost, mobile VoIP and data communications system, is pleased to announce that a lock-up agreement relating to a total of 22,344,191 shares in the Common Stock of xG (held by Stormur Holding AB, in which Palmi Sigmarsson has an indirect 58.7% controlling interest, and representing approximately 16.9% of the Company's share capital, the "Locked-up Shares") has been entered into by Palmi Sigmarsson and companies under his control.
In order to avoid the creation or continuance in the market of an impression that there may be an overhang of shares owned or held by Palmi Sigmarsson or companies under his control, they have entered into a lock-up agreement with Wennberg Industries AB ("Wennberg"), representing the Company's senior independent Director, Mats Wennberg.
Whoops! I have an invoice from Marc to a US Citizen for shares in Guardian Holdings Ehf, (Have a look in xG's shareholder register and you'll see Guardian is a major xG shareholder - the director of Guardian is Palmi Sigmarsson). So in effect they were buying xG shares whilst under lock-up. Which makes me wonder: Is Palmi the architect of this current xG/ACH scam?